The curious case of cheap foldable phones from Pablo Escobar’s brother
Company founded by sibling of late Colombian drug lord says it’s sourcing cheap from China and selling cheap worldwide, but some customers are getting skeptical
When you hear the name Escobar, you probably think of narcotics, not smartphones. Now a brand bearing that name wants to appear alongside the likes of Huawei and Samsung.
The company’s first device? A US$350 foldable phone called the Escobar Fold 1.
This cutting-edge technology doesn’t come cheap. Both models are selling for over US$1,900.
One of them was Reddit user ImNotNicknolte, who declined to use his real name for fear of retribution from Roberto Escobar and his associates. He said he never believed the phone was actually legitimate, but he was confident that his payment would be protected by his credit card company’s policy in case of a dispute.
“The device was never going to be in use, it would have been a display item hanging on a wall,” he said. “I intended to use it as [an] art and conversation piece.”
He placed an order for a Fold 1 on the official website soon after it was announced in early December. According to email correspondence seen by Abacus, he asked Escobar Inc. for an estimated shipping date a few days later and was told that delivery from Hong Kong takes about two weeks while processing takes another two.
Shortly before Christmas, ImNotNicknolte received an update, assuring him that he would receive his purchase by January. When no phone showed up by 14th, he emailed again and was told that the assembly of the phone was in full force after a holiday hiatus and that he would receive a phone with “updated specs.”
Unwilling to wait further, he insisted on a refund, but he was told to “come to Colombia if you want” and “wait a little longer.”
“The cameras which we sourced cost us less than $10 for a 20 megapixel camera,” Gustafsson told us in December. “That tells you how much Samsung and Apple have spent in advertising -- billions of dollars to make customers believe that they are buying something new and special. We give these savings to the customer.”
But industry experts question whether any phone maker could sell a foldable device at such a bargain price and still make money. Flexible displays are at an early stage of development, according to Mo Jia, an analyst with research firm Canalys. Few vendors possess this technology and “it’s extremely hard for a vendor to launch a product at a lower price without compromise on the margin,” he said.
“It’s likely the price for foldable displays will decrease in the future,” said Jia. “However, at this moment, below US$500 just seems impossible, unless the company doesn’t aim to profit from the hardware itself.”
Annabelle Hsu, an analyst with research firm IDC, agrees that a foldable phone “generally costs more” than US$500 to build.
Like ImNotNicknolte, LJP Tech was promised another phone that’s better than the one they originally ordered, according to email exchanges he showed us. On top of that, he said he also received an unexpected package: A 178-page autobiography of Roberto Escobar and a flyer congratulating the recipient for having been upgraded to the “Escobar Fold 2.” The leaflet shows a woman in underwear with a phone placed between her thighs. A few other YouTube users told us they received the same book and flyer.
In fact, Escobar Inc. now admits that the Fold 2 is simply a reskinned Galaxy Fold.
Samsung and Royole didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Gustafsson said the company decided to replace 20,000 Fold 1 orders with the Fold 2, after the assembly factory they employed in Hong Kong reported delivery issues. He said that out of 50,000 customers who ordered the Fold 1, 1,000 will receive the Fold 2 this week.
When asked how the company is able sell the phones at a much cheaper price than rivals, Gustafsson said they are buying technology from the same factories in China used by bigger companies.
“Anyone can go and approach these manufacturers and buy a Samsung Galaxy Fold clone for less than $300,” he wrote in an email. “We are not selling to retailers and therefore do not need crazy profit margins like Samsung… This is capitalism in its purest form, we are buying cheap from China and selling cheap worldwide with our powerful Pablo Escobar brand.”
(Abacus is a unit of the South China Morning Post, which is owned by Alibaba.)
Redditor ImNotNicknolte, who said he previously worked in technology assessment in southern China and Taiwan, remains skeptical about the Escobar Fold. To date, he has received neither a phone nor refund.
“[The company] is making claims about logistics and supply as if they are casual processes requiring no specific planning or agreements between vendor and client,” he said. “If this back stock is so easily obtained, where are those units?”
