Custom Search

Wikileaks Conspiracy
Assange Extradition Update

Charles Wilson

July 15^th, 2011

The story unfolding in a London court about the extadition of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to Sweden and and his Swedish sexcapades last year is getting weirder and wierder. The Swedish authorities must be getting desperate to bring a new twist to their already convoluted trumped up charge of rape against Julian Assange. It is providing fodder for conspiracy theorist.

Rape is one of the vilest crimes a man can commit against a woman. Rapist should not be given any sympathy. The flip side of that coin is that women who falsely accuse a man of such a vile act should not be shown sympathy either.

Any woman who falsely accuses a man of this despicable crime is guilty of diluting the horror and giving arrogant, egotistical and selfish men yet another excuse not to respect women. This is no trivial matter.

Abusive relationships cause immense emotional damage to society through the abused women as well as to any children. Some men learned to be abusive from having an abusive father and and seeing their mother remaining in the abusive relationship, making it appear a norm. Some women have been conditioned to expect being abused, having been raised in a toxic family environment.

I do not write about people’s private lives, especially their bedroom habits. This is one exception. Julian Assange has been branded a rapist on the one hand. But when I read the police statements by the people involved as well as the twitter messages and the SMS contacts between the two women involved, then I feel there is something murky going on.

This is a classic example of “Do not have sex with somebody before you know the person very, very well.” Assange is no rapist. He does have some moral issues though, and so do both the women involved in this mess.

Update on the Assange Case:

During the latest extradition hearing, in July 2011, Julian Assange appealed against being extradited from the United Kingdom to Sweden for two “rapes” committed in August 2010. New versions of the original rape accusation were presented that contradict the behavior of both Assange and the women when the assults were supposed to have taken place.

New revelations were Assange’s statements that he wanted to impregnate women and that he preferred virgins because he would be the first to impregnate them. How relevant is this? It sounds like puerile small talk, not some deep held philosophical belief. He also said that he thought Sweden is a good country to have kids in.

Er .. many people make that last statement in Sweden daily without any criminal intent being attached to it.

Back to the impegnating statements. Firstly Julian Assange has impregnated only one woman so far, his ex-wife, and that was a couple of decades ago. Secondly Assange does not really seem the “virgin preferred” type of man. He was flirting with very non-virgin type women during his Sweden visit.

Julian Assange’s seduction techniques are not fine tuned for virgins.

Clare Montgomery, prosecuting on behalf of the Swedish authorities in London, said the women described circumstances in which they did not freely consent without coercion. “Either by physical force or by a sense of having already been in a position whereby they felt they had no choice.”

She said that Anna Ardin had been a victim of “coercive violent sex” and was “roughed up” after she allowed Assange to stay in her apartment.

Anna Ardin is not a shy little woman with low self-esteem. She is a vociferous feminazi and active Palestinian supporter. She was expelled from Cuba for political activity. She has women’s rights work experience from both Sweden and the West Bank where she has worked as a volunteer. She also helped organize the “Ships to Gaza” sanctions breaking episode. She is quite the toughie.

So how did she respond to “coercive violent sex” and being “roughed up?”

She held a party the next evening in Assange’s honour and Twittered about how awesome it was being with the coolest people on the planet. That “coolest” included Assange. One of her friends at the party, Kajsa Borgnäs, asked Ardin if she and Assange were sleeping together, and Ardin replied that they had, but it was a lousy lay and that Borgnäs could have him if she wanted.

Anna Ardin stated after she had coerced the second woman, Sofia, to report the rape accusation, that Assange did not coerce her by saying, “He is not violent and I do not feel threatened by him.”

Well, Assange came on strong during that party and flirted off and on with Ms Borgnäs during the 8 hours she was at the party. Assange flirted with the other women who were at the party. When Ms Bongnäs decided to go home at 3 a.m. Assange wanted to tag along home with her, but she said, “No.” Ardin was not blind to the flirting, it was pretty much in-your-face behavior. According to Ms Borgnäs in her statement to the police three weeks after all this took place, Julian Assange received numerous phone calls from a woman or from women while at the party. These were from the second woman in this sordid sage, Sofia.

These people are all politically active. Ardin is active in local and international politics, her lawyer pushing for Assange to be tried for rape, Claes Borgström is a politician and Kajsa Borgnäs is seen by many Social Democrats as the future hope for the ailing Social Democratic Party. Add to this Marianne Ny, the prosecutor pushing the case against Assange is trying to set a precedents for a law that is not yet on the books. In other words they want to try Assange for something that wasn’t a crime when it took place. they all have a political agenda.

The Enköping Incident

The other woman Sofia complained that Assange was having sex with her while she was sleeping. That sounds like Assange is a monster rapist until one looks at the context.

Sofia was a groupie, short and sweet. She was all over Julian. She invited herself to a lunch with Assange, where she was clingy. After the lunch they went to see a movie and sat in the back row. Well, they did not really see the movie, because they were not aware when it ended. When the lights come on Sofia was on Julian’s lap and he had to help her put on her bra. Always the Aussie gentleman, is our friend Julian.

After that they lay in a park and engaged in heavy petting (caressing her breast with hands under her blouse) in full public view.

A few days later Julian and Sofia travelled from Stockholm to Sofia’s home in Enköping. There according to Sofia’s police statement, they had a three-hour foreplay, at which point dear Julian, who had as yet not had a full erection, fell asleep. Poor Sofia felt rejected, so she says.

They were both lying naked next to each other. Julian woke up and started getting amorous. Sofia then woke up.

The conversation went like this according to Sofia’s police statement:

Sofia: “Are you wearing anything?”

Julian: “Only you.”

Sofia: “You better not have HIV.”

Julian: “Of course not.”

Sofia then took him at his word and let him continue.

This will probably not go down as an all time classic sexy bedtime talk.

Both women were fully aware of what they were getting themselves into when they were intimate with Assange. They were both disappointed that he was not as good a lay as he is at organising Wikileaks.

Conspiracy theories about the extradition anyone? What really happened? From what we can read in the police statements Julian Assange could try to be somewhat more of a gentleman, he does not score high on a romantic scale and he is not the greatest lay, but a rapist ... hardly.

Custom Search